A breif experiment in live-blogging:
Currently sitting in consitutional law II...and we're doing Roe. V. Wade today, and...its getting ugly.
Student "A": The definition of citezen in the 14th amendment implies birth as a prerequisite for legal rights....
Professoress Con Law.: ...by that, there's no legal protection against murdering migrant workers.
Student "B": This involuntary servitude argument is B.S., sex is voluntary, the woman signed up to be pregnant.
Student "C": I guess you've never been raped...
Professoress Con Law.: Why don't we require men to donate organs if needed to their offspring to the age of 18.
Student "D": There is a massive fairness problem with requiring child support...
Student "E" Artifical incubators....
Currently sitting in consitutional law II...and we're doing Roe. V. Wade today, and...its getting ugly.
Student "A": The definition of citezen in the 14th amendment implies birth as a prerequisite for legal rights....
Professoress Con Law.: ...by that, there's no legal protection against murdering migrant workers.
Student "B": This involuntary servitude argument is B.S., sex is voluntary, the woman signed up to be pregnant.
Student "C": I guess you've never been raped...
Professoress Con Law.: Why don't we require men to donate organs if needed to their offspring to the age of 18.
Student "D": There is a massive fairness problem with requiring child support...
Student "E" Artifical incubators....
posted by Bob at
1:28:00 PM
4 Comments:
hee hee hee ... I can feel a bit of "rabid Amber" coming on ... there are SO MANY issues with reproductive rights ... ah well.
By
TheAmber, at 4:04 PM
Oh lovely. I assume you're keeping your mouth shut and not touching the subject with a ten foot pole?
Or maybe you'll just jump in with a withering assault on both sides. :)
By
Fr. A, at 9:47 AM
Professoress Con. Law is doing the withering assualt on both sides pretty well...the discussion shall continue Tuesday, and I may or may not jump in.
I do have to say that the live blogging experiment shall not be repeated, it is too hard to figure out what is interesting enough to use on the fly.
I would assume that the day(s) we do Planned Parenthood v. Casey will be much more interesting.
By
Bob, at 2:04 PM
Con Law I is such a drag. You don't talk about any of the good stuff.
By
HalfwayHouse, at 3:33 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home